The economics of Business Central delivery: closing the skills gap

Demand for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central continues to grow as organizations modernize finance, operations, and reporting. For partners, this creates a clear revenue opportunity.

However, growth alone does not guarantee profitability. As delivery complexity increases, many Dynamics 365 Business Central partners are facing a more complex operating environment. Skills gaps across consulting, development, and solution design are reducing margins, slowing delivery, and increasing risk across projects.

For senior leaders, the challenge is no longer just how to win more work. It is how to deliver it efficiently, consistently, and at scale without eroding profitability.

Why skills gaps are becoming a commercial risk

Business Central implementations are expanding in both scope and expectation. Projects now go beyond core ERP functionality into integrations, reporting, automation, and industry-specific extensions. This shift requires teams that operate across multiple disciplines, combining functional knowledge with technical capability and commercial awareness.

At the same time, access to experienced talent remains constrained. Microsoft’s 2024 Work Trend Index found that 66% of leaders would not hire candidates without AI skills, highlighting how quickly demand for new capabilities is outpacing supply and creating pressure on delivery teams.

When teams lack the right skills at the right time, projects slow down, decision-making becomes fragmented, and delivery risk increases. Over time, this creates a compounding impact on both profitability and client outcomes.

Where profitability is lost in Business Central delivery

Delivery bottlenecks delay revenue and reduce capacity

In Business Central delivery, bottlenecks rarely come from the volume of work alone. They typically emerge when specific functional or technical expertise is missing at key stages of an implementation.

For example, delays often occur during solution design when partners lack consultants with deep finance or supply chain knowledge aligned to Business Central. This can slow requirements gathering and lead to multiple design revisions before build even begins.

Similarly, gaps in extension development or integration capability can delay build phases, particularly when connecting Business Central to Power Platform, third-party ISVs, or legacy systems. What should be a structured delivery process becomes iterative and reactive.

These delays are not isolated. They cascade across the entire project lifecycle. Testing cycles are pushed back, user acceptance timelines shift, and go-live dates move.

This is often compounded by data and process complexity. IBM’s latest research shows that organizations with poor visibility and fragmented data environments experience significantly higher operational costs and longer resolution times, reinforcing how quickly inefficiencies can impact delivery performance.

The commercial impact is immediate. Revenue recognition is delayed while delivery teams remain allocated for longer than planned. Consultants who should be starting new projects are still tied up in extended engagements, reducing overall delivery capacity.

Over time, this limits a partner’s ability to scale. Pipeline may be strong, but without the right Business Central skills in place, delivery throughput becomes the constraint on growth.

 
Margin leakage in fixed-price projects

Many Business Central implementations are delivered under fixed-price or outcome-based agreements, where efficiency directly determines profitability.

When teams are not fully equipped with the right skills, delivery becomes less predictable. Tasks take longer than planned, rework increases due to errors or misconfiguration, and additional effort is required to bring projects back on track.

Over time, these inefficiencies reduce margins, even on projects that were initially forecast as profitable.

 
Overreliance on senior consultants increases costs

In the absence of a well-structured team, senior consultants are frequently used to fill delivery gaps.

While this can keep projects moving in the short term, it introduces longer-term challenges. Senior resources are the most expensive part of the delivery model, and when they are pulled into lower-value activities such as configuration support or issue resolution, their impact is diluted.

This not only increases delivery cost but also limits their ability to focus on strategic activities such as architecture, stakeholder engagement, and solution design. As a result, both delivery quality and commercial performance are affected.

 
Burnout and attrition create ongoing disruption

Sustained pressure on key individuals often leads to burnout, particularly when teams are understaffed or misaligned.

When experienced consultants leave, the consequences extend beyond a single role. Projects lose continuity, institutional knowledge is lost, and delivery teams must absorb additional pressure while replacements are found.

The World Health Organization highlights workplace stress and workload as a growing global risk to employee health and performance, reinforcing how sustained delivery pressure can directly impact retention and productivity.

That gap between capability and satisfaction highlights why retention risk rises when skilled employees feel overstretched or underdeveloped. For Business Central partners, this creates both immediate cost impact and longer-term delivery risk.

Why hiring alone is no longer enough

The default response to skills gaps is to hire experienced professionals from the market. However, this approach is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.

Hiring cycles are often lengthy, competition for talent is intense, and salary expectations continue to rise. Even when successful, hiring does not provide a predictable path to scale.

Instead, it creates dependency on market availability rather than business demand. Growth becomes constrained by who is available rather than what is required, making it difficult to plan delivery capacity and protect margins.

This challenge is becoming more pronounced as the Microsoft ecosystem continues to expand. As more partners compete for the same limited pool of experienced Business Central professionals, hiring becomes slower, more expensive, and less predictable.

In this environment, relying solely on lateral hiring limits a partner’s ability to scale in line with demand and creates ongoing pressure on both delivery timelines and margins.

How partners can future-proof Business Central delivery

To address these challenges, partners need to move beyond reactive hiring and adopt a more structured approach to workforce development.

 
Build layered Business Central delivery teams

A scalable Business Central delivery model requires more than a mix of seniority. It requires the right combination of functional, technical, and platform-specific roles aligned to how Business Central is implemented today.

Senior Business Central consultants and solution architects focus on financial design, multi-entity structures, reporting frameworks, and client advisory. Their role is to translate business requirements into scalable solutions and guide clients through transformation decisions.

Mid-level consultants take ownership of core configuration across finance, supply chain, and operations, as well as user engagement and process alignment. They play a critical role in bridging technical capability with business outcomes.

At the same time, developers and technical consultants need to focus on extensions, integrations, and customization using AL, APIs, and the wider Microsoft ecosystem, particularly Power Platform and Azure services. As Business Central projects increasingly involve integrations with CRM, data platforms, and third-party applications, this capability is becoming central to delivery.

Emerging consultants and administrators can support structured build activities such as data migration, testing cycles, documentation, and standard configurations. When trained effectively, they reduce pressure on senior resources while improving delivery consistency.

This type of role alignment is what enables partners to scale efficiently. It ensures that high-value expertise is used where it delivers the most impact, while repeatable delivery tasks are handled at the appropriate level.

 
Invest in continuous Business Central capability development

Building the right structure is only part of the solution. Business Central continues to evolve, and without ongoing capability development, delivery teams quickly fall behind.

Partners should focus continuous learning on three key areas:

1. Functional depth

Build deep expertise across core Business Central modules, including finance, warehousing, manufacturing, and project accounting. As clients demand more industry-specific solutions, consultants need strong domain knowledge that goes beyond surface-level capability. This is what enables accurate solution design and reduces rework during delivery.

2. Technical capability

Develop strong capability across extensions and integrations. This includes AL development, API integrations, and connecting Business Central with Power Platform, Dataverse, and other Microsoft services. As delivery environments become more connected, this skill set is essential to maintaining delivery speed and avoiding delays.

3. Data, reporting, and automation

Strengthen capability in data, reporting, and automation. Business Central projects increasingly require real-time reporting, Power BI integration, and workflow automation. Consultants need to structure data effectively, build reports that drive decisions, and automate processes to deliver measurable business outcomes.

 

Without structured learning in these areas, consultants are forced to develop skills during live projects, which increases risk, slows delivery, and reduces confidence across the team.

Continuous learning ensures that teams stay aligned with platform changes, reduces rework caused by knowledge gaps, and enables partners to deliver more complex projects without increasing delivery risk.

How #BCTalent supports Business Central partners

Rather than relying solely on external hiring, partners can develop talent internally and create a pipeline of consultants who are trained specifically for Business Central delivery.

#BCTalent is designed to help Microsoft partners build sustainable delivery capability by creating, developing, and upskilling Business Central professionals.

It provides multiple paths to address different stages of the talent lifecycle.

ReSKILL

ReSKILL helps partners both develop existing employees and bring in net-new talent, enabling them to build Business Central capability in a more controlled and scalable way.

For existing teams, ReSKILL provides structured Business Central training aligned to real-world delivery, allowing consultants to transition into new roles or expand their expertise. At the same time, ReSKILL supports partners in adding new talent with industry expertise and providing them with the same training, ensuring consistency across teams.

This approach strengthens internal capacity and creates a more predictable talent pipeline while reducing delivery risk and long-term dependency on reactive hiring.

UpSKILL

UpSKILL is designed for graduates and early-career professionals who want to build a strong foundation in Business Central delivery.

It helps partners bring in emerging talent and develop them through structured training aligned to real-world Business Central roles. This gives early-career professionals the technical knowledge, platform understanding, and practical context needed to start contributing with the right support around them.

For partners, UpSKILL creates a pipeline of new talent that can grow with the business over time. It strengthens future capacity, supports succession planning, and reduces overreliance on a limited pool of experienced hires.

CrossSKILL

CrossSKILL enables professionals from related ERPs such as Dynamics GP to transition into Business Central roles. This approach allows partners to leverage existing team experience, enabling faster adaptation to Business Central delivery environments.

For partners, this creates immediate advantages. It supports continuity across customer engagements, particularly for partners migrating clients from legacy Microsoft systems. By retaining existing knowledge and relationships while building Business Central capability, partners can deliver more consistent outcomes while protecting both margins and client trust.

Continuous learning membership

In addition to these pathways, #BCTalent offers a continuous learning membership that enables partners to enroll their entire team in ongoing development.

This includes access to community sessions led by Microsoft MVPs and industry experts, providing practical insights into current challenges, platform updates, and delivery best practices.

By creating a shared learning environment, partners can ensure consistency across teams and maintain high standards of delivery as the platform evolves.

The commercial impact of getting this right

When partners align talent strategy with delivery demand, the benefits extend across the business. Pluralsight’s 2024 Technical Skills Report found that 78% of organizations say their technical skills gaps have improved when they invest in upskilling, reinforcing the link between structured capability development and stronger delivery performance.

If you are looking to strengthen your Business Central delivery capability and reduce the impact of skills gaps on your projects, we would welcome a conversation.

Connect with us to learn how #BCTalent can support your team.